HIROSHIMA was another HOLOCAUST!

《ads》


Dropping the Bomb

HIROSHIMA was another HOLOCAUST!

yoshitsunekhan

USA says “we nuked to end the war because Japan had rejected surrender”. In reality Japan did not want to fight against USA from the first. But USA drove Japan into a corner to have no other choice than fighting. How selfish American’s excuse is! Japan stood up at the risk of their people’s life. If Japan could surrender so easily, she would not have stood up from the first. Because for Japanese both accepting hull note and surrender meant being slaved like other colored people. And that meant more disgrace than death. See this timeline. 1853 Perry Expedition to Japan forced to open country with cannon 1899 Open door policy USA took part in splitting China 1905 Treaty of Portsmouth Why USA mediated ? 1906 Proposal for Japan to cooperate South Manchuria Railway together But Japan rejected 1909 Proposal to neutralize South Manchuria Railway by Secretary of State Knox 1917 Lansing–Ishii Agreement USA forced Japan to admit open door policy 1922 Washington Naval Conference USA succeeded to oppress Japan’s power 1920’s War Plan Orange plans for dealing with a possible war with Japan 1936 USA-China Silver agreement China fell in under control of US Bank 1941 American Flying Tigers fought against Japanese army with Chinese army 1941 Hull note Ultimatum for Japan to give up Manchuria Then pearl harbor
Hide replies

KentA Mitchell

1853 Perry accomplished his mission with no bloodshed. Japan is lucky they were dealing with America, not Russia, Prussia, or France. The Hull note made NO MENTION of Manchuria.

yoshitsunekhan

+KentA Mitchell Hull note implicated it in reality. About Perry,it showed USA was brutal country. Such brutal country saying “we taught Japan peace with atomic bombs”. Is it joke?

KentA Mitchell

+yoshitsunekhan Brutal country? Opened Japan without bloodshed.Manchuria, China, Mongolia, Indochina- millions died, WHO is “brutal country”? A bombs forced J surrender with minimum loss of life. Too bad they were unavailable 12/8/41.

yoshitsunekhan

+KentA Mitchell Are you sane? >Brutal country? Opened Japan without bloodshed Forcing with cannon is not brutal? >Manchuria, China, Mongolia, Indochina- millions died, WHO is “brutal country”? Huh? I know Chinese killed many Chinese and exploited Indonesian people as comprador of the White.But when and where Japanese killed “local civilian”? >A bombs forced J surrender with minimum loss of life. This is sophistry. If you could say so,we could also say Pearl harbor forced USA surrender with minimum,but stupid USA fought back.Therefore it was USA’s responsibility to produce many victims not Japan’s.

KentA Mitchell

+yoshitsunekhan Japan’s unlimited territorial ambitions “to bring all 8 pillars of the world under one roof” madewar- and japan’s defeat inevitable.

Motti moti

+yoshitsunekhan KentA Mitchell said that he was serving as a lawyer for a long time several years ago to me. Can you believe that there is a stupid lawyer like him?
+Motti moti Haha,never! I cannot believe there are such stupid lawyer! Even handling sophistry,competent layer can handle better.Well,I know one troll who say “I am historian studied in Harvard”. He insisted Nanking Massacre is true.But he cannot argue with logic and fact at all.

Motti moti

+yoshitsunekhan For real? It seems that the world of a net has many irresponsible liars as expected. Such people’s talk is very tedious by a repeat of the same thing.

yoshitsunekhan

+KentA Mitchell >Japan’s unlimited territorial ambitions “to bring all 8 pillars of the world under one roof” madewar Interesting theory! Then why Japan attacked pearl harbor before storing enough power to occupy USA?

yoshitsunekhan

《ads》
+Motti moti Yes,They have common character that they have no interest in truth at all, and have only interest in demonizing Ja
pan.

KentA Mitchell

+yoshitsunekhan British historian Max Hastings estimates the death toll of Chinese civilians from the Japanese invasion 1937-1945 at over ten million. Add a million dead from starvation in Indochina, hundreds of thousands of dead in DEI, Malaya, & the Philippines.

KentA Mitchell

The Japanese game plan was 1. sneak attack 2. grab land 3. make peace 4 repeat. It worked against Russia in 1904-1905. Most J leaders had “Victory Disease” & thought it would work vs US. Only a few, like Yamamoto, saw disaster on the horizon. +yoshitsunekhan

KentA Mitchell

+yoshitsunekhan Japan’s leaders were bakasan to attack the US.

Motti moti

I have not read Max Hastings book. Where of his book is that indicated? Is it possible to indicate the page here?

yoshitsunekhan

+KentA Mitchell So Japan attacked pearl harbor without any strategy? Then why such stupid nation could keep fighting for 4 years in antagonism with USA the most powerful country in the world? USA was too stupid to handle such stupid tiny country for 4 years? Your answer is just an opinion without any fact nor evidence.It is not a right way to argue. Show me the fact or evidence to back up your opinion.

Motti moti

To see Japan in those days like country like Europe and America and China, it itself is meaningless. Japan was scarce in resources and didn’t possess a necessary ammunition to slaughter a private citizen wastefully. Moreover Japan in those days was aiming at an international first class country and was obeying international law severely. The Japanese military were the military with the high percentage of completion from those days, and the army regulations were also very severe. Therefore there is also no possibility which are the barbarous military which slaughter a private citizen like Chinese military clique.

Motti moti

It’s fact that USA kept provoking Japan persistently. And the arrogant last notice is Hull note.

yoshitsunekhan

+KentA Mitchell 1. (sneak)attack 2. grab land 3. make peace This is merely a normal process of war.It is applicable in all war.This cannot be called strategy.

yoshitsunekhan

+Scotland Ball >Stop their invasion of China and resume oil trade with the US Invasion? When did Japan INVADE against China? What did Japan demand for China? What did USA have to do with it? First off,we should correct the fact of premise.

KentA Mitchell

+yoshitsunekhan Japan invaded China July 7, 1937, Mongolia in 1939, and Indochina in ’40/’41.

yoshitsunekhan

+KentA Mitchell July 1937 Japan fought back against KMT’s attack on Japanese residents in Shanghai.It was not invasion. It was lawful defensive action.You should recognize then China was not united sovereign state. China was completely collapsed country.It was just like now Syria or recent Somalia. Japan just did peace keeping operation in China which was in anarchy.

yoshitsunekhan

+KentA Mitchell Don’t tell lies! Who firstly attacked innocent residents in Shanghai July 1937? All other foreigners blamed Chiang kai-shek,and praised small Japanese troops fighting to defend foreigners safe with great effort and discipline,perseverance. Please show me the evidence that Japan firstly attacked China? Otherwise you cannot say Japan invaded China.

Motti moti

+Scotland Ball To be honest, it’s Chinese military clique that Japan was provoked. Japan is doing considerable endurance.

KentA Mitchell

+yoshitsunekhan Japan first invaded China August 1, 1894, seized Tsingtao in 1918, and invaded Manchuria in 1931. All 42 other members of the members of the League of Nations condemned China’s aggression and Japan left the League. July 7, 1937 Japanese “peacekeepers ” invaded China and by December were 200 miles up the Yangtze, carrying out the Rape of Nanking. Japan’s unlimited territorial ambitions made war , and Japan’s defeat, inevitable..

yoshitsunekhan

+KentA Mitchell Don’t change the subject! You propagandist always manipulate the impression without no ground. Firstly tell me why KMT attacked innocent residents in Shanghai July 1937? Before that what kind of invasive action Japan did?

Motti moti

+KentA Mitchell Does a stupid liar lawyer still keep telling a falsehood? The feature of the Korean often shows for you. Lol Are you Korean American? Please do talk of your family who spoke to me before again. You do the talk different surely.

Motti moti

+KentA Mitchell Anyway my English isn’t a point of a problem. A lie and a war crime in a victorious country are a point of a problem. I, a lie and a war crime, blame. Please do talk of your family who was speaking before. And are you Korean American?

yoshitsunekhan

+KentA Mitchell Haha,I know Korean always start to poke English skill,when they were cornered. How miserable county you live in where you cannot get higher education with your own language. And how pitiable your servile character is that only to boast the ability to manage your new master’s language(Old one was Japanese).You should value your own language than your master’s language. Again tell me before the battle of Shanghai August 1937,what kind of invasive action Japan did?

Motti moti

Korean is stupid. They abandoned their original Hangul alphabet Japan made be revived after the war. A Hangul alphabet is the language lost once. When not using a kanji and a Hangul alphabet together, it’ll be an immature language scarce in an expression. Evil of the present Hangul alphabet. 1. They can’t read the document when merging. 2. They can’t speak logically. 3. They can’t make an objective viewpoint. Therefore they have to learn other languages.

《ads》

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.